Monday, December 12, 2016
In Your face Forbidden Planet Intro In VR 360
WIP Playing around a little. Tried to make the Forbidden Planet letters humongous and have the ship nearly land on top of you. Kinda cool. I also did my own credits In 360. I'm using forbidden planet and Blade runner to figure out how to do drama and action in VR/360. Thinking of doing my next scene with Robby or maybe in Morbius house I got some great models off 3D Warehouse
Friday, October 28, 2011
Part 2 of My Proof God does not Exist!
Nature vs. Intelligence – What's the confusion?
hear on youTube
Many atheist like to point out and argue the apparent un-intelligence of our universe, and indeed that is incredibly easy given the diversity and opportunistic nature of evolution. The problem with this approach is that it misses the big point. Embedded in the Creationist argument is the assumption that nature and god could be confused; that evolution and the acts of the creator some how look the same. That the forms they produce and the apparent methods they used would appear so close to each other that millions of scientist over the past 150 years of looking into where we come from would have missed those nuances in the physical record that would have proved there was a creator. Logically this makes no sense since there is nothing connecting the two realities except of course the need by the believer to fit their intelligent designer in to the constraints of the real world.
Part 1 of My Proof God does not Exist!
No Physical evidence of god and his domain.
hear it on youTube
If there really was a god what would you expect? Well for one thing, I would have expected that science would have validated the existence of god and related supernatural phenomena by now. Now don't take this as some pompous scientific hand waving. You don't have something that interacts with our bodies and minds and not have some obvious impact in the physical world at least at the molecular/atomic level. The problem is that if god existed in the way most theist tend to imply, you would not expect it to be some weak subtle influence but something rather spectacular and widespread, at least as compared to our current understanding of subatomic particles and quantum mechanics.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Population Weighted History
In Pharyngula article Humanity’s recent surge, PZ discusses a chart from The Economist. The chart deals with population and growth rate on the same time scale by century.
The article got me wondering how the data would look if you plotted it along a population weighted year (PWYr) time scale.
(NOTE: this idea seems quite simple and obvious, so I suspect someone has done this before, but I could not find it.).
(NOTE: this idea seems quite simple and obvious, so I suspect someone has done this before, but I could not find it.).
So what is a PWYr?
A PWYr is a measure of time based on the number of years lived collectively by a population over some long time scale (i.e. where population is changing dramatically). It turns out that a PWYr is equal average population over a reference period. A table of PWYr shift the years such that it creates a corresponding date within the reference period that assumes a constant population over that period.
A PWYr is a measure of time based on the number of years lived collectively by a population over some long time scale (i.e. where population is changing dramatically). It turns out that a PWYr is equal average population over a reference period. A table of PWYr shift the years such that it creates a corresponding date within the reference period that assumes a constant population over that period.
So whats good about it?
The interesting thing is that change especially for technology, knowledge, and research driven endeavors like economics, science, longevity, communication, etc. should be at least in part proportional to the number of people living. In other words, for any society, the more people there are, the more that can contribute to change, and so the faster the change appears. I came up with the notion of a PWYr a few years ago and always thought it would be an interesting way to watch change over the centuries.
So what does it look like?
To see what a Population Weighted Year looks like, I used World population data from Wikipedia to calculate roughly how many years lived over each of the population intervals. I then summed the total years lived and divided by the total period covered to get the average population, which is also the number of years lived in a population weighted year. When I took the period from 0 CE to 2010, I get:
So what does it look like?
To see what a Population Weighted Year looks like, I used World population data from Wikipedia to calculate roughly how many years lived over each of the population intervals. I then summed the total years lived and divided by the total period covered to get the average population, which is also the number of years lived in a population weighted year. When I took the period from 0 CE to 2010, I get:
1 PWYr (0-2010) = 603,902 years lived
From there is is simple to calculate the equivalent date in PWYrs for each interval which I have calculated in Table 1. You may ask Why 0 to 2010? I was trying to look at the time line from roughly to day and so 2010 was the closest date to today.
Table 1: Calendar year vs Population weighted Year (PWYr) based on the average population (603902890) from year 0 to 2010. Therefore, 1 PWYr is equivalent to 603,902,890 years lived by the world population. The data came from Wikipedia World Population Estimates article.
Year
|
Estimate Population*
|
Population Weighted Year (PWYr)
|
-8000
|
5000000**
|
-2020
|
0
|
300000000
|
0
|
1000
|
310000000
|
505
|
1250
|
400000000
|
652
|
1500
|
500000000
|
838
|
1800
|
978000000
|
1179
|
1850
|
1262000000
|
1271
|
1900
|
1650000000
|
1392
|
1930
|
2070000000
|
1483
|
1950
|
2529346000
|
1559
|
1960
|
3023358000
|
1605
|
1970
|
3685777000
|
1660
|
1980
|
4437609000
|
1727
|
1990
|
5290452000
|
1808
|
2000
|
6115367000
|
1902
|
2010
|
6908688000
|
2010
|
*UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2008)
**Population for 8000 BCE is from Population Reference Bureau (1973–2008)
Monday, July 25, 2011
Sita Sings the Blues
I want to thank Helmet (The Friendly Atheist) for the link to a really great movie by Nina Paley "Sita Sings The Blues". I love the imagery, the intermix of modern day and ancient Hindu, the comedy and of course most of all the music. I love the sweet and comic use of 1920's songs by Annette Hanshaw (playlist). Here is the movie:
Per the video description:
Per the video description:
"Sita Sings the Blues" is based on the Hindu epic "The Ramayana". Sita is a goddess separated from her beloved Lord and husband Rama. Nina Paley is an animator whose husband moves to India, then dumps her by email. Three hilarious shadow puppets narrate both ancient tragedy and modern comedy in this beautifully animated interpretation of the Ramayana. Set to the 1920's jazz vocals of torch singer Annette Hanshaw, Sita Sings the Blues earns its tagline as "the Greatest Break-Up Story Ever Told." It is written, directed, produced and animated by American artist Nina Paley.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Covers of the Week - What Becomes of the Brokenhearted (Jimmy Ruffin)
What Becomes of the Brokenhearted is a classic Motown R&B in this 1966 hit for Jimmy Ruffin (playlist) and there are some ereally great covers of the years.
Joan Osborne (playlist) does a really great soulful version.
Here is better version of it but I could not embed it
Joan Osborne (playlist) does a really great soulful version.
Here is better version of it but I could not embed it
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Cover of the Week - Love is a Battlefield (Pat Benatar)
Love is a Battlefield by Pat Benatar (playlist) is one of my favorite songs of all-times. Although several of Pat's songs would fit in that title. Power and passion pulsated from her rock and roll and flows into her covers.
For something differenct, I'll start off with a version by Pat Benatar & Neil Giraldo but not the original but a very nice slightly different acoustic version
For something differenct, I'll start off with a version by Pat Benatar & Neil Giraldo but not the original but a very nice slightly different acoustic version
Monday, July 11, 2011
Covers of the Week - Scarborough Fair (English traditional)
Scarborough Fair is a traditional English ballad. Most people now it by way of Simon & Garfunkel. Not really a lot of variation but very beautiful.
Mike Masse and Sterling Cottam
Mike Masse and Sterling Cottam
Sunday, July 10, 2011
My Random Meme of the Week #2
9/14/11 - Revised numbering system
Da Rules (a work in progress)
1. I hold no truths to be absolute and no absolutes to be true. (No Absolutes Rule)
2. I hold no truth to be self evident. (No Free Ride rule)
3. I hold no belief on anything for which we humans know nothing about. (No Making Shit up rule)
4. I hold no humans can truly know or even imagine anything infinite and reality seems to concur. (Nothing infinite matters Rule)
5. I hold no abstractions to be real except as they manifest their usefulness to the holder. (Usefulness of Abstractions Rule)
6. I hold no belief about others that I am not willing to apply to myself. (Play Fair Rule)
7. I hold no human like being is behind any aspect of our universe except our own actions. (Don't be Narcissistic rule)
8. I hold no delusion that humans are inherently logical. (Silly Humans rule)
9. I hold on to reality as tightly as I can. (Reality rules!)
10. I hold my pants up with a belt, most times. (Token Reality Rule)
11. Follow the evidence wherever it takes you (Prime directive)
12.Belief shapes Perception (Believing is Seeing)
13. Never be afraid to be wrong (but don't guess)
14. Be honest with yourself above all else.
15. Live within the bounds of human experience and not human imagination.
16. Define yourself by what you know and not what you don't know.
17. Hope for the best but be prepared for the worst.
18. Worry and anger do nothing to improve a situation
19. All things in moderation especially moderation (seek balance over the center).
20. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, when you don't know what else to do.
21. Almost nobody sees themselves as truly evil or completely wrong.
22. Conspiracy is much rarer than incompetence in explaining the human state.
23. You've got to save a lot a butt if you want to get away with murder
Additionally I use
1.Occam's Razor - when faced with competing hypothesis that are equal in other respects, selecting the one that makes the fewest new assumptions.
2. Sagan Standard - Extreme claims require extreme evidence
At one point this was a couple of pages but in trying to simplify my beliefs, I have tryed to keep it to whats important.
Da Rules (a work in progress)
1. I hold no truths to be absolute and no absolutes to be true. (No Absolutes Rule)
2. I hold no truth to be self evident. (No Free Ride rule)
3. I hold no belief on anything for which we humans know nothing about. (No Making Shit up rule)
4. I hold no humans can truly know or even imagine anything infinite and reality seems to concur. (Nothing infinite matters Rule)
5. I hold no abstractions to be real except as they manifest their usefulness to the holder. (Usefulness of Abstractions Rule)
6. I hold no belief about others that I am not willing to apply to myself. (Play Fair Rule)
7. I hold no human like being is behind any aspect of our universe except our own actions. (Don't be Narcissistic rule)
8. I hold no delusion that humans are inherently logical. (Silly Humans rule)
9. I hold on to reality as tightly as I can. (Reality rules!)
10. I hold my pants up with a belt, most times. (Token Reality Rule)
11. Follow the evidence wherever it takes you (Prime directive)
12.Belief shapes Perception (Believing is Seeing)
13. Never be afraid to be wrong (but don't guess)
14. Be honest with yourself above all else.
15. Live within the bounds of human experience and not human imagination.
16. Define yourself by what you know and not what you don't know.
17. Hope for the best but be prepared for the worst.
18. Worry and anger do nothing to improve a situation
19. All things in moderation especially moderation (seek balance over the center).
20. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, when you don't know what else to do.
21. Almost nobody sees themselves as truly evil or completely wrong.
22. Conspiracy is much rarer than incompetence in explaining the human state.
23. You've got to save a lot a butt if you want to get away with murder
Additionally I use
1.Occam's Razor - when faced with competing hypothesis that are equal in other respects, selecting the one that makes the fewest new assumptions.
2. Sagan Standard - Extreme claims require extreme evidence
At one point this was a couple of pages but in trying to simplify my beliefs, I have tryed to keep it to whats important.
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Covers of the Week - The Lazy Song (Bruno Mars)
Took a weak off, and so I'm back with a new cover. This week it's Bruno Mars' (playlist) The Lazy Song which came out in February of 2011. Like most new songs, most of the covers tend to be done by fans and in Brono's original style but there are a lot of them and there are some really good performances. This song also has a lot of very funny parodies and I've added some but be aware some are a little adult so if your a easily offended don't watch.
Chester See has a great version on the softer side
Chester See has a great version on the softer side
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Covers of the Week - Mash-up Special
This week is some thing different (and of course anything different is good). For those that don't know a mash-up is where multiple songs are are combined into one. Here is a link to my regular mashups playlist which I call Non-Linear Melodies. Tonight I've collected some of my favorite acoustic mash-ups and mash-up covers from my Organic Mashups Playlist on youTube.
Mashing up Umbrella and Singing in the Rain has been done multiple time by Jamie Cullum and Glee. My favorite version is by Sonnet its a little more tender and just a better covers.
Mashing up Umbrella and Singing in the Rain has been done multiple time by Jamie Cullum and Glee. My favorite version is by Sonnet its a little more tender and just a better covers.
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Covers of the Week - Poker Face (Lady Gaga)
"There's a fine line between a generic person from the 80s and Janice from the Muppet Show, and Lady Gaga dares to ride that line" (Molly Lewis).What can you say about Lady Gaga (playlist)? She is becoming the quintessential pop icon for today's generation. Poker Face is one of my favorite Lady Gaga songs and has the diverse set of covers to make it fun.
Molly Lewis (youTube) has fun with Lady Gaga
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Covers of the Week - Crazy (Gnarls Barkley)
Last in our Crazy May trio is Gnarls Barkley's (playlist) Crazy which came out in 2006 and is a fun one. With loads of great covers that make you head bob, foot tap, butt squirm and your whole body rock out to a great party song.
Starting off with Nelly Furtado(playlist) absolutely awesome version
Starting off with Nelly Furtado(playlist) absolutely awesome version
Atheism as a Religion
hear it on youTube
This is a response to the youTube Videos: "Atheism is a Religion"...? by BionicDance and An Atheist Calls Atheism a Religion by GrapplingIgnorance.
This is a response to the youTube Videos: "Atheism is a Religion"...? by BionicDance and An Atheist Calls Atheism a Religion by GrapplingIgnorance.
When people argue about whether atheism is a religion or not, they are almost always arguing against 2 different usage (definitions) of the word atheism/atheist in society.
First off there is the classic dictionary definitions ... namely that atheism is the lack of a belief in god, the disbelief in God, and or the belief that god does not exist. As such it gives no other restrictions on the beliefs of atheists other than to say that they share a single belief about god. Religion or religious beliefs, on the other hand, is the set of beliefs and practices by which a person or group identify themselves or by others. Reality is atheism, theism, and agnosticism are really just a way we group or categorize a broader set of beliefs which can be typically sub divided into specific religions/religious beliefs. You would not claim that theism is a specific religion or religious belief. Even deists in general usage has a set of beliefs and share a common identity that defines itself as a religious belief. Under this definition atheism indeed cannot be a religion.
The second usage of atheists/atheism references the collection of people that call themselves atheist. People who use this definition tend to see atheism as more than just a group that shares a single belief but instead sees a community who share a whole suite of beliefs about skepticism, naturalism, science, and rational advocacy that dominate the popular atheist movement. While I have yet to see this usage in a dictionary, some atheists, most notably PZ Myers, do tend to advocate this usage. Moreover many atheist will chastise other atheists who stray from orthodoxy of their "atheism" especially as it relates to tolerance and support in various forms of nonsense. Depending on your definition of religion, you could easily argue that this group would constitute a religion or at least a set of religious beliefs in that they share a common set of beliefs, doctrine, and identity; and are loosely organized (all be it in a very decentralized manner) and have established and recognizable leaders and advocates.
First off there is the classic dictionary definitions ... namely that atheism is the lack of a belief in god, the disbelief in God, and or the belief that god does not exist. As such it gives no other restrictions on the beliefs of atheists other than to say that they share a single belief about god. Religion or religious beliefs, on the other hand, is the set of beliefs and practices by which a person or group identify themselves or by others. Reality is atheism, theism, and agnosticism are really just a way we group or categorize a broader set of beliefs which can be typically sub divided into specific religions/religious beliefs. You would not claim that theism is a specific religion or religious belief. Even deists in general usage has a set of beliefs and share a common identity that defines itself as a religious belief. Under this definition atheism indeed cannot be a religion.
The second usage of atheists/atheism references the collection of people that call themselves atheist. People who use this definition tend to see atheism as more than just a group that shares a single belief but instead sees a community who share a whole suite of beliefs about skepticism, naturalism, science, and rational advocacy that dominate the popular atheist movement. While I have yet to see this usage in a dictionary, some atheists, most notably PZ Myers, do tend to advocate this usage. Moreover many atheist will chastise other atheists who stray from orthodoxy of their "atheism" especially as it relates to tolerance and support in various forms of nonsense. Depending on your definition of religion, you could easily argue that this group would constitute a religion or at least a set of religious beliefs in that they share a common set of beliefs, doctrine, and identity; and are loosely organized (all be it in a very decentralized manner) and have established and recognizable leaders and advocates.
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Covers of the Week - Crazy (Seal)
Released in 1990, Crazy by Seal (playlist) is an awesome song. Being the middle sister of our Crazy trio, it may not get the recognition of the other Crazys and indeed Alanis Morissette is the only big name to cover it but it has some great covers with a diversity of styles.
Alanis Morissette (playlist) great version
Alanis Morissette (playlist) great version
Monday, May 9, 2011
The Anti-Pascal Counter Wager.
hear it on you Tube
If you believe that God exist and you're right, the odds are that you will not believe in the right god so your life time of servitude and debasement to a god will mean nothing since your ancestors picked the wrong god and you will be punished with the rest of the non believers.
If you believe that God exist and you're wrong, then you have wasted your life subservient to a being your ancestors made up, and all the bull shit you put up with was for nothing.
If you believe that God does not exist and you're right, then you are free to make the best of your life, share what you learn in life, and pass it on to the next generation.
And if you believe that God does not exist and you're wrong, the odds are that you will have the same fate as all those who believed in the wrong god (which should be most of them) but at least you tried to do the best you can.
If it made any difference to god if we believed in him, then it would seem quite reasonable that those who believed wrong would share the same fate. If god wanted us to believe in him, then we would know who the right god is... since everyone does not share the same belief about god, then you probably believe in the wrong one. In the end its a suckers bet to believe in god.
If you believe that God exist and you're right, the odds are that you will not believe in the right god so your life time of servitude and debasement to a god will mean nothing since your ancestors picked the wrong god and you will be punished with the rest of the non believers.
If you believe that God exist and you're wrong, then you have wasted your life subservient to a being your ancestors made up, and all the bull shit you put up with was for nothing.
If you believe that God does not exist and you're right, then you are free to make the best of your life, share what you learn in life, and pass it on to the next generation.
And if you believe that God does not exist and you're wrong, the odds are that you will have the same fate as all those who believed in the wrong god (which should be most of them) but at least you tried to do the best you can.
If it made any difference to god if we believed in him, then it would seem quite reasonable that those who believed wrong would share the same fate. If god wanted us to believe in him, then we would know who the right god is... since everyone does not share the same belief about god, then you probably believe in the wrong one. In the end its a suckers bet to believe in god.
Covers of the Week - Crazy (Patsy Cline)
The Crazy Trilogy - First one up from 1962 is the truly classic and tender Crazy written by Willie Nelson (playlist) and made famous by Patsy Cline (Playlist). One of the few country songs that I really love and it goes way back to my childhood. Maybe its the deeply melancholy lyrics that I seem to have a fascination for.
Norah Jones (playlist)
Norah Jones (playlist)
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Covers of the Week - Smells like Teen Spirit (Nirvana)
This week I've chosen a modern classic that I have enjoyed the diversity of performances for years. Smells Like Teen Spirit by Nirvana (playlist) is one of those songs that define a generation. This song some of the bet diversity of performance and any other in my collection of covers.
Tori Amos (playlist) version is a classic unto itself as she throughly "torisizes" it.
Tori Amos (playlist) version is a classic unto itself as she throughly "torisizes" it.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Covers of the Week - I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry (Hank Williams Sr.)
I am not a big fan of country and western music. I don't dislike but I typically don't include it among normal listening. But there are exceptions especially when it comes to classic country blues like the next classic. I've always loved Hank Williams Sr. (playlist) since I was a wee little boy and "I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry" is probably my favorite.
Cowboy Junkies (playlist) bring their own melancholy style
Cowboy Junkies (playlist) bring their own melancholy style
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
